2 minutes, 30 seconds

I’ve had three friends with yahoo accounts send me email that was clearly not them sending it. It was a spammer. One friend had every contact emailed, in alphabetical order, in groups of 10. The symptoms seem to be:

• Emails are really sent from yahoo account, there’s a copy in the “sent mail” folder
• Password is changed such that you need to call yahoo or otherwise reset your password
• Groups of 10 people emailed

Another geek friend reported the same with a number of his friends who have yahoo email getting hacked as well. Him contacting me prompted this post to get awareness out there ( you know, to all 3 of you who read this). No real news on the interwebs, leave this post: Who Hijacked Yahoo Mail?

Here’s the nice view of the email (sensitive data yas been obscured with “***********”)::

From: Anders ***********
To: egwit, awarnow, avkirby, starsister77, apnun, ann, jara, apollostwinsis., haywoodashley, me
date: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:06 PM
subject: Bettina Mischkalla

http://nmprint.com.au/go.friend.php

Here’s the raw email I got from my friend’s hacked account (sensitive data yas been obscured with “***********”):

                   
          
Delivered-To: mrjones@***********.com
Received: by 10.231.143.16 with SMTP id s16cs151659ibu;
        Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.58.10 with SMTP id g10mr4771311rva.57.1266361611517;
        Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: 
Received: from ***********.com (***********.com [207.29.224.50])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31si10777747pzk.62.2010.02.16.15.06.51;
        Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of 
mrjones@***********.com designates 207.29.224.50 as permitted sender) 
client-ip=207.29.224.50;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best 
guess record for domain of mrjones@***********.com designates 
207.29.224.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mrjones@***********.com; 
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@yahoo.com
Received: by ***********.com (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 2AFAC968B7C; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:06:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mrjones@***********.com
Delivered-To: mrjones@***********.com
Received: from web53107.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53107.mail.re2.yahoo.com 
[206.190.49.57])
	by ***********.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D7D4968B58
	for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Feb 2010 23:06:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; 
s=s1024; t=1266361597; bh=oJtmpSDF9JfgKjw+1+Q+Wqxiiq1f0Qc9sio+EdymNik=;
 h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oFCN9QuJ13WOanJxxKZHrcbLHOZOMviKII3sm
 Wu/Rno7BWX4i8mBO6CHijcUGJPj/7P1ryPEfVSCB/k72CUbSHcHaJZIpLbF0EXwLje
 uVvkTB/BaeMHhTn5DPbW2h7bcKCvt0AlwfUXUQ+1K3t2zpBH1slw/eUoJqEEVx58A2Ew=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:
  MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=kzg14b6v1xa8NPMqRfu5XCsz4dFXa7bASb6Vj3Epb6I74/a8t5rVPWCOBfPtR1C
  2Bg67H5UqE3nmdd/hqTKWmUfOKh/g2rhEuXX23ghs080LTudbyqwF0hQSLVmPlhAQ
  RcedYf86UYfC5Ox8SpH/76T2gc+LRlqglfPenlpLRzw=;
Message-ID: 
X-YMail-OSG: ppvFaJUVM1kacZ05sJo0wMYepvD5By3Oxe96QISv6KgKBxmq0_Q1r1
8k75jrUQId8bPmqNP8IjHUU8OBB8bfkioPzwwMw7pj1Br2YORw.qhjM8uWFe8yr_wQv
i7YEAoLhtQvNnyTU.5SLv6lIQFUrTxp6huhu1iOVzwW5PtokoZoBQLQ82lLd_jMg1L6
9lCXsoRvQi6C5PTDrobDdUz7VOj3h0yRWEFf00zgrQ.Vs9kf2cU2epyUdQQuJ_juBPx
accPy7psP2vYnb7ErtxGxfUayl85HvFPG575oMywmq6e8PKqpKz04xXdgwqhgZ6g5qs
5_feAiiHiTH5Tz5gpTdCCuzNThjs3436jDWaTpWx8-
Received: from [66.196.86.118] by web53107.mail.re2.yahoo.com via 
HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:06:37 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:06:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Anders ***********
Subject: Bettina Mischkalla
To: "egwit@***********.com" ,
  "awarnow@***********.com" ,
  "avkirby@***********.com" ,
  "starsister77@***********.com" ,
  "apnun@***********.com" ,
   "ann@***********.com" ,
  "jara@***********.com" ,
  "apollostwinsister@***********.com" ,
  "haywoodashley@***********.com" ,
  "mrjones@***********.com" 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


http://nmprint.com.au/go.friend.php

0 minutes, 16 seconds

A bit ago I posted about how Firefox 3.5 doesn’t have an easy way to reset all the cookies and cache files and the like. I stand corrected. Not only does it has this feature, it has an even better ‘clear for the last hour’ or ‘clear for all time’. Handy! I took some screen shots to show ya.

1 minute, 6 seconds

I know that it’s not that hard to find out how to do it , but I am still disappointed two fold in how hard it is to reset Firefox 3.5. First, if you look at Safari, it’s super easy to reset it. Secondly, it’s not called ‘resetting’, it’s called ‘safe mode’. Further, your mom doesn’t want to do this on her mac:


/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin -safe-mode

Yeah, I guess for the most part your mom isn’t doing bleeding edge AJAX development that hoses her browser so she needs to do a full factory reset like I was today. But still, make it easier for me?

Sadly, the lil’ ol’ plip blog probably isn’t popular enough to give ‘reset ff3.5’ a higher ranking in google to turn up ‘use safe mode, silly!’

For those who read our Safari full time post of yore, you ask, “what’s the verdict?” The verdict is I use both. I would say that on a Mac, Safari is hands down an insanely fast browser. Faster that FF3 or FF3.5. However, firebug is the absolute no contest, pack it up and go home winner of JS debugging, DOM tweaking, ad hoc CSS styling, OMG there’s-another-feature-I-didn’t-know-about web developers god send life raft. Indeed. So, I use both. Yes, it does help to have a silly amount of screen real estate:

Update: Firefox 3 had the feature want, I just remembered!

Update 2: I’m wrong. Firefox 3.5 does have it.